Memory +500%: Bullish, But I’m Not Chasing

Isleigh
12:37

Memory just gave us another reminder that this cycle is anything but normal.

Intel's CEO warned that memory prices have risen more than 500% and shortages could worsen next year. The market immediately heard the supplier-side implication: extraordinary pricing power. MU jumped 5.50% to $977.50, while SNDK gained about 6.2%. 

But there is an important distinction:

500% higher memory costs are fantastic for sellers. They are painful for buyers.

And eventually, extremely high prices can become their own demand problem.

🔥 Why I Am Still Bullish

The shortage thesis is getting harder to dismiss.

AI servers require enormous amounts of memory, supply remains constrained, and Intel is now warning from the buyer's side that the shortage could worsen.

That is powerful confirmation.

Micron also enters its 30 September earnings with the market already focused on stronger pricing, constrained supply and AI demand. 

But I would not interpret +500% as "buy memory stocks at any price."

The higher prices go, the more customers have incentives to optimise usage, delay purchases or seek alternatives. Meanwhile, Chinese competition remains the longer-term supply threat. CXMT is reportedly planning to expand beyond DRAM into NAND, while YMTC already has a meaningful NAND position. 

So my thesis has evolved from:

Memory shortage = buy

to:

Memory shortage = buy the right company at the right price.

🎯 MU Pick Level: $977.50

MU is still my preferred fundamental memory trade.

Its advantage is that the AI story is directly feeding demand for higher-value DRAM and advanced memory.

But after another 5.5% jump, I would not chase.

🟢 $930 to $960: My preferred accumulation zone

🟡 $960 to $1,000: Selective buys / hold

🔥 Above $1,020: I want earnings or another fundamental catalyst before adding aggressively

🔴 Below $900: Thesis check, especially if memory pricing or demand weakens

The key event is 30 September earnings.

If MU confirms that higher contract pricing is flowing through to revenue and margins, I think $1,000 can turn from resistance into support.

🎯 SNDK Pick Level: $1,614

SNDK is different.

NAND pricing gives it tremendous operating leverage, but I think SNDK carries more risk if investors suddenly decide the memory cycle has become too good.

My levels:

🟢 $1,500 to $1,575: Preferred accumulation

🟡 $1,575 to $1,650: Hold / selective buying

🔥 Above $1,700: I would not chase without another catalyst

🔴 Below $1,450: Thesis check

🧠 The Bigger Signal

There was another important development this week.

The Fed raised rates 25bp to 3.75%-4.00% and policymakers signalled another increase could come this year. Yet MU and SNDK subsequently rallied strongly as Treasury yields eased. 

That tells me the memory thesis is still powerful enough to overcome a hostile macro backdrop.

But +500% is also where I stop thinking only about scarcity and start thinking about cycle maturity.

The number I care about next is not whether memory prices rise another 50%.

It is whether MU and SNDK can convert today's extraordinary pricing into earnings faster than customers and new supply respond.

For now, I still want exposure.

MU is my preferred fundamental play. SNDK is my higher-volatility pricing play. And after this run, I would rather wait for my levels than chase either.

I am not a financial advisor. Trade wisely, Comrades!

Modified in.54 minutes ago
Memory Prices Up Over 500% — Does That Still Count as Good News?
Memory rallied Thursday on a line from Intel's CEO: memory prices are up more than 500%. Micron +5.50% to $977.50, SanDisk +6.21% to $1,614.39, SK Hynix +4.64% to $182.99. Intel led them all, +7.67% to $108.80, on a second day of the SK Hynix foundry reports, which several outlets say is still not a deal. Wednesday the foundry rose 4% and memory sat still; Thursday memory caught up. Worth noting who said it. The 500% is a buyer describing what it now pays, not a seller reporting what it now earns. Same sentence, read as a cost complaint and as a bull case. Which is it?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment
1